You are welcome to add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md as well

Built artifacts for commit b8e11bd

Firmware

• Ultra APP DFU Package
• Ultra binaries
• Lite APP DFU Package
• Lite binaries

Client

• Linux
• macOS
• Windows

Just sharing some thoughts, feel free to ignore, I don't want to make your life harder neither unless you think it's worth investigating...

To also support BLE in CLI, the way seems to use Bleak, which is based on asyncio. If we move to a unified asyncio model for transports, there is also pyserial-asyncio.
Now for TCP, if you use Streams it's also asyncio.

So, maybe should we investigate moving to a unified asyncio API for transport?
(I must confess I've always more difficulties thinking with async than sync, but well...)

Just sharing some thoughts, feel free to ignore, I don't want to make your life harder neither unless you think it's worth investigating...

To also support BLE in CLI, the way seems to use Bleak, which is based on asyncio. If we move to a unified asyncio model for transports, there is also pyserial-asyncio. Now for TCP, if you use Streams it's also asyncio.

So, maybe should we investigate moving to a unified asyncio API for transport? (I must confess I've always more difficulties thinking with async than sync, but well...)

migrating to async might be worth it to prevent future issues, etc.

It would require some rearchitecturing but I do agree that going async might be a better choice with the transaction model we currently have. Could take a look at that pretty soon but can't say for sure